More International Students are being admitted to American Colleges
Friday, October 16, 2015
Research Blog #3: How Privatization Connects to My Topic
Privatization connects to my topic because the trend of enrolling more and more international students contributes substantially to the increase
of college tuition in the US. This idea is discussed in many ways in the readings
such as “Understanding privatization.” In this reading "The Chinese Mother;s American Dream", the author Karin Fischer argues "American colleges offer relatively little financial assistance to international undergraduates, which is where the real growth from China has been. Indeed, though many institutions are loath to admit it, overseas recruitment has been a budgetary bright spot during and after the recession. Chinese students’ ability to pay is part of their appeal" (Fischer 7). The observation reflects that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between China's booming economy and the growing admission rates of Chinese students into American colleges. International students are willing to contribute twice the tuition in order to have the opportunity to be educated in American colleges since Chinese parents believe that the Return on Investment is incalculable if their children can earn a bachelors degree in the US. Therefore, the trend tends to drive up the overall cost of attending colleges especially when state funding drops simultaneously. Not only do the cost of textbooks increases, but universities also privatize services (hiring part-time professors, outsourcing accounting and dining services, etc.), which add more miscellaneous fees to tuition. Consequently, both American students and international students undertake more financial pressure and concern more about graduation. The worries of being exploited the education privileges thus adversely affect their academic performance as well as psychological health. I would like to gather more information of how the growing tuition cost affect students' as individuals because I believe that students from affluent families must experience differently from those who take students loans to attend colleges. I would assume that admitting international students implicitly reinforces the prevalence of privatizing American's public higher education and will continuously explore the issue on a more sophisticated level.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think you have a good understanding of the privatization issue. It goes even further. Basically, there are recruitment offices that are acting very much like those used by for-profit colleges, working to get international students enrolled at Rutgers. It is a business, and it is not focused on more than the bottom line. In fact, even the accounting practices do not take into account the real cost of supporting international students. For example, the Writing Program has seen a huge increase in our courses and in our students in tutoring. But no money has been set aside to assist us with the impact of international students. Instead, the extra tuition that international students pay has already been siphoned off to support the development of the engineering and business programs. It appears to me to be very short sighted policy that is totally focused on just getting the students here and making sure that they have the visa and can pay the bills, not whether or not they are prepared to survive academically or socially. Or that is my impression. I would be curious to know what sort of support Rutgers is offering to its international students beyond help enrolling. If there is none, then that is a sign right there of the influence of privatization.
ReplyDelete